|  
               Ham knows and widely used to Symmetrical Trap Dipole Antennas. 
                Classical example of such antenna is W3DZZ antenna. At my opinion 
                such antennas has just one benefit- patterns of the antennas are 
                almost the same at the different bands. However, the antennas 
                have lots deficiency. There are heavy weight, complexity in design, 
                large enough windage and narrow bandwidth at the lower bands, 
                high SWR at some bands. 
              Asymmetrical Dipole Antennas (that are used 
                by hams) are free from some of lacks of the Symmetrical Trap Dipole 
                Antennas. However the main lack of the Asymmetrical Dipole Antennas 
                is the main lobe of the diagram directivity at lower bands is 
                toward to main lobes at the other upper bands. 
                
             | 
             
               An interesting antenna was design by me by combination of these two 
                types of antennas- Symmetrical Dipole Antennas and Asymmetrical 
                Dipole Antennas. I called it "Asymmetrical Trap Dipole Antenna." 
                The antenna has pattern almost similar to pattern of Symmetrical 
                Trap Dipole Antennas. However the antenna needs twice less traps 
                compare to Symmetrical Trap Dipole Antennas. So, Asymmetrical 
                Trap Dipole Antenna is more easy to tune up and has less windage 
                (compare to Symmetrical Trap Dipole Antennas). 
              Figure 1 shows the design of 
                the Asymmetrical Trap Dipole Antenna. Dimensions of the antenna 
                are given for height 15 meter over the ground (there are in the 
                brackets dimension for height 15 meter over the ground) 
                
             | 
          
           
            |  
               How the antenna works: At the 40- meter Band there are left 
                wire and wire up to trap on 7- MHz take part in the antenna radiation. 
                So it is asymmetrical dipole with the ratio of the sides 1:2. 
                At the 80- meter Band there are left wire and wire up to trap 
                on 3.5- MHz take part in the antenna radiation. So it is asymmetrical 
                dipole with the ratio of the sides 1:2, however, the left wire 
                of the dipole is the less wire of the antenna. At the 160- meter 
                band all right part of the antenna works. It is not classical 
                asymmetrical dipole with ratio 1:2. However because of the inductors 
                in the right wire and low height above the ground the antenna 
                may be matched with 110- Ohm with SWR 1.25:1 . 
                
              The antenna has input impedance close to 110- Ohm at its 
                working Bands. Antenna may be match with 50- Ohm coaxial cable 
                by binocular transformer 1:2.56. References 1, 
                2 are described such transformers. Do not use autotransformers. As a rule autotransformer does not provide cut-off 
                RF current from the outer braid of the coaxial cable. 
                
             | 
             
               So the cable would be radiated and very possible RFI and TVI around 
                of the antenna. It would be useful to install RF choke on the 
                coaxial cable before the entering the cable in to the room. 
                
              To prevent 
                breakdown of the transformer by static electricity it should be 
                installed resistor on 100- kOhm (or more) in bridge with antenna 
                wire (any of them, or, that is better, between the middle point 
                of the transformer) and the braid of the coaxial cable. The braid 
                should be grounded in the shack. I made traps for the antenna 
                accordingly to Reference 3. 
                
              Picture of the similar traps are at Reference 4. 
              Figure 2 
                shows pattern of the antenna installed at height 30 meter above 
                the ground. 
                
             |