Well, why I did a Two- Elements YAGI? Why not Three,
Four or more Elements YAGI? Or, say, so popular 2-5/8 or 3-5/8
Vertical Collinear Antenna?
Okey, at first, just begin from the beginning. From
the theory. As the theory says, multi elements antennas (in the
case, YAGI) have a large near field zone. The more elements the
antenna contains- the more sized near field zone the antenna has.
All subjects that are located inside the near field zone are influenced
to the parameters of the antenna.
Conclusion: So- the more elements an antenna is contained - the more free space should be around the antenna.
The conclusion
was proved by me. For a while I had to use a commercial (from
www.tangenta.ru) made Four and Six Elements
YAGI. The antennas are perfect antennas only the antennas have
enough large free
|
space
around, for example, the antennas are installed on the roof. But
I need a balcony antenna. Place at balcony was very limited. I
could install only antenna that goes at 1- 1.5- meters outside
the balcony. Only the limitation makes me to look for an antenna
suitable for such conditions.
Four Elements YAGI works bad at such
close to wall (up to 1-meter) installation. There was so called
"ladder" effect. The effect means that at one frequency
a station is going at 59, step to 25- kHz the station is going
at 58, another step 25-kHz- 59. The more elements have YAGI- the
more the "ladder" effect presents. Where a Two Elements
YAGI is working at 1 meter from a wall there Four Elements YAGI
is required 1.5-meter distance from the wall.
Second question
is- why not collinear but YAGI. Collinear works badly at my installation
on the balcony. Lots reflected and spurious signals from nearest
buildings do the reception too noise and unpredictable.
|